page
Categories

Search Results for

Grid List
Filter By

All Results

  • Blog
  • Beyond the Steriliser

Article

Beyond the Steriliser

Homepage - gke Australia 
Beyond the Steriliser

Why Air Removal & Steam Penetration Matter in Dental Practices

With the release of AS 5369:2023, functionality and routine testing of sterilisation processes have become highly topical for dental practices. Ensuring that steam reaches every surface of an instrument is critical for patient safety. This article briefly outlines the principles of air removal and steam penetration and explains how routine monitoring with a Process Challenge Device (PCD) helps meet the requirements of the new standard.

Getting Steam Where It Needs to Go

Steam sterilisation only works if steam reaches all instrument surfaces - including every pack and pouch, and inside hollow handpieces, turbine bodies, and other lumened instruments. Any residual air or non-condensable gases act as a barrier. Research shows, even small air pockets can block steam from penetrating hollow instruments, leaving hidden areas unsterile. This is why air removal and steam penetration are the real tests of a steriliser’s performance - not just reaching a set temperature.

Why Dentists Should Care

  • Dental instruments often have narrow lumens and joints where steam struggles to enter.
  • A cycle that “runs” doesn’t guarantee sterilisation if steam hasn’t penetrated properly.
  • Patient safety depends on making sure every instrument is truly sterile.

Daily Monitoring with a Process Challenge Device

  • To prove your steriliser is doing its job, use a Process Challenge Device (PCD) - a test piece that mimics the toughest-to-sterilise instrument.
  • Daily air removal steam penetration test: After the vacuum test and before your “live loads,” place the PCD in an empty chamber in your steriliser and run the functionality test (Bowie Dick Test or Helix Test) to verify complete air removal and steam penetration and ensure the steriliser is ready to function for the day.
  • Routine monitoring: Build confidence that every instrument in every load is safe.

Why GKE PCDs Lead the Way

Not all PCDs are equal. Some cheaper plastic devices degrade, warp, or fail to mimic real dental instruments.

The GKE PCD is different:

  • Durability – withstands repeated use without losing accuracy.
  • Stainless steel design – mimics real instruments; unlike plastic, it accurately replicates heat transfer and steam condensation for reliable testing.
  • Worst-case simulation – replicates hollow handpieces and lumens.
  • Trusted worldwide – validated through extensive research.
  • Cost-effective over time – long lifespan compared with disposable or plastic alternatives.
  • Meets AS 5369:2023 requirements – a PCD for a benchtop steriliser must conform to ISO 11140-6 in accordance with AS5369:2023.

If your steriliser passes the GKE PCD, you know your instruments are safe.

Takeaway for Your Practice

Reliable sterilisation means more than pressing “start.”

✔ Air must be removed.
✔ Steam must penetrate.
✔ Every cycle must be monitored to a hollow level.

With the GKE PCD, dentists can be confident they are protecting their patients, their staff, and their practice.

Latest Blog Articles

Use of a New Universal Flowable Composite

Use of a New Universal Flowable Composite
What are the most important properties of a flowable composite used for the flowable injection technique? Personal experience shows that balanced optical properties are essential, with an appropriate translucency, blend-in ability and surface gloss leading the way. However, the mechanical properties are also important, not least because the restorative material will be in direct contact with the antagonist teeth. And finally, handling properties are essential: The right level of flowability is needed for proper injection, while a void-free application is required for an intact, stainresistant surface.

Irradiance vs. Power: Curing Light Performance

Irradiance vs. Power: Curing Light Performance

As curing light technology improves, dentists are consistently sold on irradiance (mw per cm2) as being the defining factor in beam effectiveness. While there is no doubt irradiance adds value, it does not tell the full story of how well a light will cure various materials. Irradiance tests typically only show the irradiance of a very small portion of the light. Measuring the power distributed over the entire beam tells a more comprehensive story of its curing capabilities.